In the era of remote work and virtual teams, OrgLab analyzes the organizational impact of innovative coordination mechanisms and digital collaboration frameworks. We examine how organizations, platforms, and ecosystems leverage technology for distributed decision-making, knowledge sharing, and agile responsiveness. Our goal is to produce actionable insights on designing more effective and resilient intra and inter-organizational networks.
Abstract. Leveraging technologies in organizations promotes the adoption of new ways of working. Distributed work models like Work-From-Home (WFH) are instances of this phenomenon. This study empirically investigates the age-dependent effects of WFH frequency, gender, and work-life balance on workers’ self-reported mental well-being. Using age-stratified regression analyses on EWCTS (European Working Conditions Telephone Survey) 2021 data from 46,426 European workers in ICT-teleworkable roles, we found that high-frequency WFH correlates with lower self-reported mental well-being, an effect that was strongest in younger/mid-career cohorts but attenuated in older workers. Females consistently reported lower well-being. Crucially, good work-life balance strongly predicted higher well-being across all ages. These findings highlight age-specific vulnerabilities and resiliencies, offering evidence for developing age-inclusive, equitable digital work policies that support well-being across the life course in the evolving future of work.
Reference. Varone, A. and Bolici, F. (2026) “Digital Work and Aging: An Empirical Study on Age-Dependent Effects of Work-from-Home, Gender, and Work-Life Balance on Self-Reported Mental Well-Being,” in A. Ricciardelli and L. Mercurio (eds.) Building Innovation in Ageing and Health Policy. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland (Springer Series in Healthcare Management and Innovation), pp. 211–226. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09163-5_12.
Abstract. Work is continually reshaped by innovative technologies and managerial practices. This study employs a bibliometric-based approach to address the conceptual ambiguity in distributed work models research. By analyzing the concepts of remote work, telework and telecommute, our findings indicate that: i. paradigmatic shifts in distributed work models research primarily occur in response to exogenous events, especially consisting of technological advancements and environmental crises; ii. the terminological structure highlighted in the literature is only partially confirmed; iii. while all concepts share a core thematic focus, telecommute is distinctively more concerned with mobility, sustainability and infrastructural technologies. Telework and remote work share a more direct organizational focus, with telework being more human-centric and remote work emphasizing technology-oriented connotations. Thus, telework should be preferentially targeted by research on health, wellbeing and organization behaviors, while remote work should be targeted by research at the interplay between distributed work models, organization design and innovative technologies.
Reference. Bolici, F., Varone, A. and Diana, G. (2025) “Innovating Workspaces: The Evolution of Distributed Work From Telecommute to Remote Work,” ECIS 2025 Proceedings [Preprint]. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2025/general_track/general_track/9.
Abstract. Post-pandemic Return-to-Office (RTO) mandates, following widespread remote work, have generated significant organizational challenges and employee resistance. This systematic literature review analyzes 26 papers to understand the evolution of RTO research and its organizational implications. Findings reveal three distinct phases: Anticipation & Adaptation (2020-2021), focusing on early remote work experiences and speculative returns; Transition & Contestation (2022-2023), marked by initial RTO implementations, debates, and legal considerations; and Evaluation & Inequality (2024-2025), characterized by critical assessments of RTO impacts, particularly differential effects and the exacerbation of inequalities for marginalized groups. Scholarly discourse has shifted from viewing RTO as inevitable to questioning its necessity and emphasizing the need for flexible, context-specific, and equitable strategies. This study establishes RTO as a key area within distributed work literature, offering practitioners evidence-based insights for managing workplace transitions effectively.
Reference. Varone & Bolici (2025). From Speculation to Implementation: A Systematic Review of Return-to-Office Research and Its Impact for Organizations. Accepted for publication in Proceedings of WOA 2025 - Pescara, Italy.
Abstract: Inter-organizational collaboration is often challenged by stakeholders’ dissimilarities in backgrounds and frames of reference. Accordingly, the design of new approaches to address the complexity of collaborative work environments is required. In this paper, we present the FUSE: a framework for the collaborative discovery, analysis and redesign of complex inter-organizational processes.The FUSE is structured in four stages: Framing, Co-designing the meaning, In-depth interviews and Co-ordination. Its design incorporates influences from CoP theories, design science, action review and business process modelling techniques. The FUSE was tested by analysing the cross-sectoral processes implemented by the Italian, Slovenian and Serbian national health systems in response to the 2018 West Nile Virus epidemic. In this context, it was praised for its ease of use, its collaborative focus and perceived usefulness in coordinating the participating institutions. The FUSE may support innovation within network structures, sustainable development within circular ecosystems and streamline the design of inter-organizational processes. Future research is needed to validate the FUSE effectiveness in different industries and contexts, including the international and virtual environment.The FUSE distinguishes from other frameworks by contributing a systematic approach to co-design inter- organizational processes, specifically emphasising the harmonisation of divergent perspectives and the mitigation of task conflicts.
Reference. Bolici, Diana and Varone (2023). From Process-Users to Process-coDesigners: a Framework for Inter-organizational Process Design in Complex Domains. In Proceedings of AIDEA XL. Salerno, Italy
Abstract. The vast majority of literature on coordination in team-based projects has drawn on a conceptual separation between explicit (e.g. plans, feedback) and implicit coordination mechanisms (e.g. mental maps, shared knowledge). This analytic distinction presents some limitations in explaining how coordination is reached in organizations characterized by distributed teams, scarce face to face meetings and fuzzy and changing lines of authority, as in free/libre open source software (FLOSS) development. Analyzing empirical illustrations from two FLOSS projects, we highlight the existence of a peculiar model, stigmergic coordination, which includes aspects of both implicit and explicit mechanisms. The work product itself (implicit) and the characteristics under which it is shared (explicit) play an under-appreciated role in helping software developers manage dependencies as they arise. We develop this argument beyond the existing literature by working with an existing coordination framework, considering the role that the codebase itself might play at each step. We also discuss the features and the practices to support stigmergic coordination in distributed teams, as well as recommendations for future research.
Reference. Bolici, Howison, and Crowston (2016). Stigmergic coordination in FLOSS development teams: Integrating explicit and implicit mechanisms. In Cognitive Systems Research 38 (2016): 14-22.
Abstract. Trust is a social factor at the foundations of human action. The pervasiveness of trust explains why it has been studied by a large variety of disciplines, and its complexity justifies the difficulties in reaching a shared understanding and definition. As for all the social factors, trust is continuously evolving as a result of the changes in social, economic and technological conditions. The internet and many other Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) solutions have changed organizational and social life. Such mutated scenarios challenged what researchers know about trust, thus several studies tried to investigate the difference between online and traditional (physical) environments. The purpose of this paper is to solve this multi‐dimensional puzzle by presenting a conceptual framework that will take into consideration the complexity of ICT mediated‐trust.The extant literature still lacks a homogeneous framework and presents a large amount of different perspectives, each one addressing a very specific issue. By using the methodology suggested by Short and Cropanzano the paper proposes a conceptual model for understanding the dynamics of trust in online settings. In doing so the authors' adopted the Actor Network Theory conceptual frame for disentangling the ambiguous role of technology in its relation with trust. This paper provides an ultimate conceptual model on trust in virtual settings. The proposed model will help systematize the extant contributions and also identify the gaps that can be addressed by future researches. The model permits the understanding of the dynamics of trust in online settings.
Reference. Giustiniano and Bolici (2012). Organizational trust in a networked world: analysis of the interplay between social factors and Information and Communication Technology. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 10.3 (2012): 187-202.